|
|
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) |
Line 29: |
Line 29: |
| can be found in reference <ref name="oberhofer2005"/>. | | can be found in reference <ref name="oberhofer2005"/>. |
|
| |
|
| == Anderson thermostat ==
| |
|
| |
| * For a slow-growth simulation, one has to perform a calcualtion very similar to {{TAG|Constrained molecular dynamics}} but additionally the transformation velocity-related {{TAG|INCREM}}-tag for each geometric parameter with <tt>STATUS=0</tt> has to be specified. For a slow-growth approach run with Andersen thermostat, one has to:
| |
| #Set the standard MD-related tags: {{TAG|IBRION}}=0, {{TAG|TEBEG}}, {{TAG|POTIM}}, and {{TAG|NSW}}
| |
| #Set {{TAG|MDALGO}}=1, and choose an appropriate setting for {{TAG|ANDERSEN_PROB}}
| |
| #Define geometric constraints in the {{FILE|ICONST}}-file, and set the {{TAG|STATUS}} parameter for the constrained coordinates to 0
| |
| #When the free-energy gradient is to be computed, set {{TAG|LBLUEOUT}}=.TRUE.
| |
|
| |
| <ol start="5">
| |
| <li>Specify the transformation velocity-related {{TAG|INCREM}}-tag for each geometric parameter with <tt>STATUS=0</tt>.</li>
| |
| </ol>
| |
|
| |
| == Nose-Hoover thermostat ==
| |
| * For a slow-growth approach run with Nose-Hoover thermostat, one has to:
| |
| #Set the standard MD-related tags: {{TAG|IBRION}}=0, {{TAG|TEBEG}}, {{TAG|POTIM}}, and {{TAG|NSW}}
| |
| #Set {{TAG|MDALGO}}=2, and choose an appropriate setting for {{TAG|SMASS}}
| |
| #Define geometric constraints in the {{FILE|ICONST}}-file, and set the <tt>STATUS</tt> parameter for the constrained coordinates to 0
| |
| #When the free-energy gradient is to be computed, set {{TAG|LBLUEOUT}}=.TRUE.
| |
| <ol start="5">
| |
| <li>Specify the transformation velocity-related {{TAG|INCREM}}-tag for each geometric parameter with <tt>STATUS=0</tt></li>
| |
| </ol>
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| VASP can handle multiple (even redundant) constraints. Note, however, that a too large number of constraints can cause problems with the stability of the [[#SHAKE|SHAKE algorithm]]. In problematic cases, it is recommended to use a looser convergence criterion (see {{TAG|SHAKETOL}}) and to allow a larger number of iterations (see {{TAG|SHAKEMAXITER}}) in the [[#SHAKE|SHAKE algorithm]]. Hard constraints may also be used in [[#Metadynamics|metadynamics simulations]] (see {{TAG|MDALGO}}=11 {{!}} 21). Information about the constraints is written onto the {{FILE|REPORT}}-file: check the lines following the string: <tt>Const_coord</tt>
| |
|
| |
|
| == References == | | == References == |
Line 62: |
Line 38: |
| ---- | | ---- |
|
| |
|
| [[Category:Molecular dynamics]][[Category:Slow-growth approach]][[Category:Theory]][[Category:Howto]] | | [[Category:Advanced molecular-dynamics sampling]][[Category:Theory]] |
The free-energy profile along a geometric parameter can be scanned by an approximate slow-growth
approach[1].
In this method, the value of is linearly changed
from the value characteristic for the initial state (1) to that for
the final state (2) with a velocity of transformation
.
The resulting work needed to perform a transformation
can be computed as:
In the limit of infinitesimally small , the work
corresponds to the free-energy difference between the the final and initial state.
In the general case, is the irreversible work related
to the free energy via Jarzynski's identity[2]:
Note that calculation of the free-energy via this equation requires
averaging of the term
over many realizations of the
transformation.
Detailed description of the simulation protocol that employs Jarzynski's identity
can be found in reference [3].
References
- ↑ T. K. Woo, P. M. Margl, P. E. Blochl, and T. Ziegler, J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 7877 (1997).
- ↑ C. Jarzynski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2690 (1997).
- ↑ . Oberhofer, C. Dellago, and P. L. Geissler, J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 6902 (2005).