GGA: Difference between revisions

From VASP Wiki
Line 32: Line 32:
<ref name="mattson:jcp:08">[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2835596 A. E. Mattsson, R. Armiento, J. Paier, G. Kresse, J.M. Wills, and T.R. Mattsson, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 084714 (2008).]</ref>
<ref name="mattson:jcp:08">[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2835596 A. E. Mattsson, R. Armiento, J. Paier, G. Kresse, J.M. Wills, and T.R. Mattsson, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 084714 (2008).]</ref>
<ref name="mattson:prb:09">[http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.155101 A. E. Mattsson and R. Armiento, Phys. Rev. B 79, 155101 (2009).]</ref>
<ref name="mattson:prb:09">[http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.155101 A. E. Mattsson and R. Armiento, Phys. Rev. B 79, 155101 (2009).]</ref>
<ref name="perdew:prl:08">J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406 (2008).</ref>
<ref name="perdew:prl:08">[http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.155107 J. P. Perdew, A. Ruzsinszky, G. I. Csonka, O. A. Vydrov, G. E. Scuseria, L. A. Constantin, X. Zhou, and K. Burke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136406 (2008).]</ref>
</references>
</references>
----
----

Revision as of 12:23, 4 February 2011

GGA = PW | PB | LM | 91 | PE | RP | PS | AM
Default: GGA = type of exchange-correlation in accordance with the POTCAR file 

Description: GGA specifies the type of generalized-gradient-approximation one wishes to use.


This tag was added to perform GGA calculation with pseudopotentials generated with conventional LDA reference configurations.

Possible options are:

PB Perdew -Becke
PW Perdew -Wang 86
LM Langreth-Mehl-Hu
91 Perdew -Wang 91
PE Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof
RP revised Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof
AM AM05[1][2][3]
PS Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof revised for solids (PBEsol)[4]

The tags AM (AM05) and PS (PBEsol) are only supported by VASP.5.X. The AM05 functional and the PBEsol functional are constructed using different principles, but both aim at a decent description of yellium surface energies. In practice, they yield quite similar results for most materials. Both are available for spin polarized calculations.

References


Contents