Thermodynamic integration with harmonic reference: Difference between revisions

From VASP Wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:
Unfortunately, there are several problems linked with such a straightforward approach. First, the systems with rotational and/or translational degrees of freedom cannot be treated in a straightforward manner because <math>V_{0,\mathbf{x}}(\mathbf{x})</math> is not invariant under rotations and translations. Conventional TI is thus unsuitable for simulations of gas phase molecules or adsorbate-substrate systems. and this problem also imposes restrictions on the choice of thermostat used in NVT simulation (Langevin thermostat, for instance, does not conserve position of the center of mass and is therefore unsuitable for the use in conventional TI). Furthermore, if the Hesse matrix of the harmonic system has one or more eigenvalues that nearly vanish, the simulations with <math>\lambda \rightarrow </math> 0 is likely to generate unphysical configurations causing serious convergence issues. These problems have been addressed in series of works by Amsler et al.  
Unfortunately, there are several problems linked with such a straightforward approach. First, the systems with rotational and/or translational degrees of freedom cannot be treated in a straightforward manner because <math>V_{0,\mathbf{x}}(\mathbf{x})</math> is not invariant under rotations and translations. Conventional TI is thus unsuitable for simulations of gas phase molecules or adsorbate-substrate systems. and this problem also imposes restrictions on the choice of thermostat used in NVT simulation (Langevin thermostat, for instance, does not conserve position of the center of mass and is therefore unsuitable for the use in conventional TI). Furthermore, if the Hesse matrix of the harmonic system has one or more eigenvalues that nearly vanish, the simulations with <math>\lambda \rightarrow </math> 0 is likely to generate unphysical configurations causing serious convergence issues. These problems have been addressed in series of works by Amsler et al.  


First, the method was formulated in terms of rotationally and translationally invariant internal coordinates <math>\mathbf{q}=\mathbg{q}(\mathbf{x})</math>
First, the method was formulated in terms of rotationally and translationally invariant internal coordinates <math>\mathbf{q}=\mathbf{q}(\mathbf{x})</math>, whereby the free energy of interacting system is repartitioned as follows:
:<math>
:<math>
A_1 = A_{0,\vct{x}} + \Delta A_{0,\vct{x} \rightarrow 0,\vct{q}} + \Delta A_{0,\vct{q} \rightarrow 1}  
A_1 = A_{0,\mathbf{x}} + \Delta A_{0,\mathbf{x} \rightarrow 0,\vct{q}} + \Delta A_{0,\vct{q} \rightarrow 1}  
</math>
</math>
where <math>\Delta A_{0,\mathbf{x} \rightarrow 0,\vct{q}}</math> is the free energy change due to transformation from the system harmonic in <math>\mathbf{x}</math> to the system harmonic in <math>\mathbf{q}</math> and <math>\Delta A_{0,\vct{q} \rightarrow 1} </math> is that for the transformation from the system harmonic in <math>\mathbf{q}</math> to a fully interacting system.

Revision as of 07:48, 2 November 2023

The Helmholtz free energy () of a fully interacting system (1) can be expressed in terms of that of system harmonic in Cartesian coordinates (0,) as follows

where is anharmonic free energy. The latter term can be determined by means of thermodynamic integration[1] (TI)

with being the potential energy of system , is a coupling constant and is the NVT ensemble average of the system driven by the Hamiltonian

Free energy of harmonic reference system within the quasi-classical theory writes

with the electronic free energy for the configuration corresponding to the potential energy minimum with the atomic position vector , the number of vibrational degrees of freedom , and the angular frequency of vibrational mode obtained using the Hesse matrix . Finally, the harmonic potential energy is expressed as

Thus, a conventional TI calculation consists of the following steps:

  1. determine and in structural relaxation
  2. compute in vibrational analysis
  3. use the data obtained in the point 2 to determine that defines the harmonic forcefield
  4. perform NVT MD simulations for several values of and determine
  5. integrate over the grid and compute

Unfortunately, there are several problems linked with such a straightforward approach. First, the systems with rotational and/or translational degrees of freedom cannot be treated in a straightforward manner because is not invariant under rotations and translations. Conventional TI is thus unsuitable for simulations of gas phase molecules or adsorbate-substrate systems. and this problem also imposes restrictions on the choice of thermostat used in NVT simulation (Langevin thermostat, for instance, does not conserve position of the center of mass and is therefore unsuitable for the use in conventional TI). Furthermore, if the Hesse matrix of the harmonic system has one or more eigenvalues that nearly vanish, the simulations with 0 is likely to generate unphysical configurations causing serious convergence issues. These problems have been addressed in series of works by Amsler et al.

First, the method was formulated in terms of rotationally and translationally invariant internal coordinates , whereby the free energy of interacting system is repartitioned as follows:

Failed to parse (Conversion error. Server ("cli") reported: "[INVALID]"): {\displaystyle A_1 = A_{0,\mathbf{x}} + \Delta A_{0,\mathbf{x} \rightarrow 0,\vct{q}} + \Delta A_{0,\vct{q} \rightarrow 1} }

where Failed to parse (Conversion error. Server ("cli") reported: "[INVALID]"): {\displaystyle \Delta A_{0,\mathbf{x} \rightarrow 0,\vct{q}}} is the free energy change due to transformation from the system harmonic in to the system harmonic in and Failed to parse (Conversion error. Server ("cli") reported: "[INVALID]"): {\displaystyle \Delta A_{0,\vct{q} \rightarrow 1} } is that for the transformation from the system harmonic in to a fully interacting system.