Matsubara formalism: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Huebsch moved page Matsubara Formalism to Matsubara formalism) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 06:44, 29 September 2023
The zero-temperature formalism of many-body perturbation theory breaks down for metals (systems with zero energy band-gap) as pointed out by Kohn and Luttinger.[1] This conundrum is lifted by considering diagrammatic perturbation theory at finite temperature , which may be understood by an analytical continuation of the real-time to the imaginary time axis . Matsubara has shown that this Wick rotation in time reveals an intriguing connection to the inverse temperature of the system.[2] More precisely, Matsubara has shown that all terms in perturbation theory at finite temperature can be expressed as integrals of imaginary time quantities (such as the polarizability ) over the fundamental interval .
As a consequence, one decomposes imaginary time quantities into a Fourier series with period that determines the spacing of the Fourier modes. For instance the imaginary polarizability can be written as
and the corresponding random-phase approximation of the correlation energy at finite temperature becomes a series over (in this case, bosonic) Matsubara frequencies
The Matsubara formalism has the advantage that all contributions to the Green's function and the polarizability are mathematically well-defined, including contributions from states close to the chemical potential , such that Matsubara series also converges for metallic systems.
Although formally convenient, the Matsubara series converges poorly with the number of considered terms in practice. The VASP code, therefore, uses a compressed representation of the Fourier modes by employing the Minimax-Isometry method.[3] This approach converges exponentially with the number of considered frequency points.