LDAUTYPE

LDAUTYPE = 1 | 2 | 4
Default: LDAUTYPE = 2 

Description: LDAUTYPE specifies which type of DFT+U approach will be used.

---

The semilocal LDA and GGA functionals often fail to describe systems with localized (strongly correlated) d and f-electrons (this manifests itself primarily in the form of unrealistic one-electron energies and too small magnetic moments). In some cases this can be remedied by introducing a strong intra-atomic interaction in a (screened) Hartree-Fock like manner, as an on-site replacement of the semilocal functional. This approach is commonly known as the DFT+U method. Setting LDAU=.TRUE. in the INCAR file switches on DFT+U. The first VASP DFT+U calculations, including some additional technical details on the VASP implementation, can be found in Ref. (the original implementation was done by Olivier Bengone and Georg Kresse).

• LDAUTYPE=1: The rotationally invariant DFT+U introduced by Liechtenstein et al.

This particular flavour of DFT+U is of the form

$E_{\rm HF}=\frac{1}{2} \sum_{\{\gamma\}} (U_{\gamma_1\gamma_3\gamma_2\gamma_4} - U_{\gamma_1\gamma_3\gamma_4\gamma_2}){ \hat n}_{\gamma_1\gamma_2}{\hat n}_{\gamma_3\gamma_4}$

and is determined by the PAW on-site occupancies

${\hat n}_{\gamma_1\gamma_2} = \langle \Psi^{s_2} \mid m_2 \rangle \langle m_1 \mid \Psi^{s_1} \rangle$

and the (unscreened) on-site electron-electron interaction

$U_{\gamma_1\gamma_3\gamma_2\gamma_4}= \langle m_1 m_3 \mid \frac{1}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}^\prime|} \mid m_2 m_4 \rangle \delta_{s_1 s_2} \delta_{s_3 s_4}$

where |m⟩ are real spherical harmonics of angular momentum $\ell$=LDAUL.

The unscreened e-e interaction U_γ1γ3γ2γ4 can be written in terms of the Slater integrals $F^0$, $F^2$, $F^4$, and $F^6$ (f-electrons). Using values for the Slater integrals calculated from atomic orbitals, however, would lead to a large overestimation of the true e-e interaction, since in solids the Coulomb interaction is screened (especially $F^0$).

In practice these integrals are often treated as parameters, i.e., adjusted to reach agreement with experiment for a property like the equilibrium volume, the magnetic moment or the band gap. They are normally specified in terms of the effective on-site Coulomb- and exchange parameters, $U$ and $J$ (LDAUU and LDAUJ, respectively). $U$ and $J$ can also be extracted from constrained-LSDA calculations.

These translate into values for the Slater integrals in the following way (as implemented in VASP at the moment):

$L\;$	$F^0\;$	$F^2\;$	$F^4\;$	$F^6\;$
$1\;$	$U\;$	$5J\;$	-	-
$2\;$	$U\;$	$\frac{14}{1+0.625}J$	$0.625 F^2\;$	-
$3\;$	$U\;$	$\frac{6435}{286+195 \cdot 0.668+250 \cdot 0.494}J$	$0.668 F^2\;$	$0.494 F^2\;$

The essence of the DFT+U method consists of the assumption that one may now write the total energy as:

$E_{\mathrm{tot}}(n,\hat n)=E_{\mathrm{DFT}}(n)+E_{\mathrm{HF}}(\hat n)-E_{\mathrm{dc}}(\hat n)$

where the Hartree-Fock like interaction replaces the LSDA on site due to the fact that one subtracts a double counting energy $E_{\mathrm{dc}}$, which supposedly equals the on-site LSDA contribution to the total energy,

$E_{\mathrm{dc}}(\hat n) = \frac{U}{2} {\hat n}_{\mathrm{tot}}({\hat n}_{\mathrm{tot}}-1) - \frac{J}{2} \sum_\sigma {\hat n}^\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}({\hat n}^\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}-1).$

• LDAUTYPE=2: The simplified (rotationally invariant) approach to the DFT+U, introduced by Dudarev et al.

This flavour of DFT+U is of the following form:

$E_{\mathrm{DFT+U}}=E_{\mathrm{LSDA}}+\frac{(U-J)}{2}\sum_\sigma \left[ \left(\sum_{m_1} n_{m_1,m_1}^{\sigma}\right) - \left(\sum_{m_1,m_2} \hat n_{m_1,m_2}^{\sigma} \hat n_{m_2,m_1}^{\sigma} \right) \right].$

This can be understood as adding a penalty functional to the LSDA total energy expression that forces the on-site occupancy matrix in the direction of idempotency,

$\hat n^{\sigma} = \hat n^{\sigma} \hat n^{\sigma}$.

Real matrices are only idempotent when their eigenvalues are either 1 or 0, which for an occupancy matrix translates to either fully occupied or fully unoccupied levels.

Note: in Dudarev's approach the parameters $U$ and $J$ do not enter seperately, only the difference $U-J$ is meaningful.

• LDAUTYPE=4: same as LDAUTYPE=1, but LDA+U instead of LSDA+U (i.e. no LSDA exchange splitting).

In the LDA+U case the double counting energy is given by,

$E_{\mathrm{dc}}(\hat n) = \frac{U}{2} {\hat n}_{\mathrm{tot}}({\hat n}_{\mathrm{tot}}-1) - \frac{J}{2} \sum_\sigma {\hat n}^\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}({\hat n}^\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}-1).$

---

Warning: it is important to be aware of the fact that when using the L(S)DA+U, in general the total energy will depend on the parameters $U$ and $J$ (LDAUU and LDAUJ, respectively). It is therefore not meaningful to compare the total energies resulting from calculations with different $U$ and/or $J$, or $U-J$ and in case of Dudarev's approach (LDAUTYPE=2).

Note on bandstructure calculation: the CHGCAR file contains only information up to angular momentum quantum number $\ell$=LMAXMIX for the on-site PAW occupancy matrices. When the CHGCAR file is read and kept fixed in the course of the calculations (ICHARG=11), the results will be necessarily not identical to a selfconsistent run. The deviations are often large for L(S)DA+U calculations. For the calculation of band structures within the L(S)DA+U approach, it is hence strictly required to increase LMAXMIX to 4 (d elements) and 6 (f elements).

Related Tags and Sections

LDAU, LDAUL, LDAUU, LDAUJ, LDAUPRINT, LMAXMIX

Examples that use this tag

References

---

Contents