LDAUTYPE: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
n}_{\gamma_1\gamma_2}{\hat n}_{\gamma_3\gamma_4} | n}_{\gamma_1\gamma_2}{\hat n}_{\gamma_3\gamma_4} | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
:and is determined by the PAW on site occupancies | :and is determined by the PAW on-site occupancies | ||
::<math> | ::<math> | ||
{\hat n}_{\gamma_1\gamma_2} = \langle \Psi^{s_2} \mid m_2 \rangle | {\hat n}_{\gamma_1\gamma_2} = \langle \Psi^{s_2} \mid m_2 \rangle | ||
\langle m_1 \mid \Psi^{s_1} \rangle | \langle m_1 \mid \Psi^{s_1} \rangle | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
:and the (unscreened) on site electron-electron interaction | :and the (unscreened) on-site electron-electron interaction | ||
::<math> | ::<math> | ||
U_{\gamma_1\gamma_3\gamma_2\gamma_4}= \langle m_1 m_3 \mid | U_{\gamma_1\gamma_3\gamma_2\gamma_4}= \langle m_1 m_3 \mid | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
:The unscreened e-e interaction ''U''<sub>γ<sub>1</sub></sub><sub>γ<sub>3</sub></sub><sub>γ<sub>2</sub></sub><sub>γ<sub>4</sub></sub> can be written in terms of the Slater integrals <math>F^0</math>, <math>F^2</math>, <math>F^4</math>, and <math>F^6</math> (f-electrons). Using values for the Slater integrals calculated from atomic orbitals, however, would lead to a large overestimation of the true e-e interaction, since in solids the Coulomb interaction is screened (especially <math>F^0</math>). | :The unscreened e-e interaction ''U''<sub>γ<sub>1</sub></sub><sub>γ<sub>3</sub></sub><sub>γ<sub>2</sub></sub><sub>γ<sub>4</sub></sub> can be written in terms of the Slater integrals <math>F^0</math>, <math>F^2</math>, <math>F^4</math>, and <math>F^6</math> (f-electrons). Using values for the Slater integrals calculated from atomic orbitals, however, would lead to a large overestimation of the true e-e interaction, since in solids the Coulomb interaction is screened (especially <math>F^0</math>). | ||
:In practice these integrals are therefore often treated as parameters, ''i.e.'', adjusted to reach agreement with experiment in some sense: equilibrium volume, magnetic moment, band gap, structure. They are normally specified in terms of the effective on site Coulomb- and exchange parameters, ''U'' and ''J'' ({{TAG|LDAUU}} and {{TAG|LDAUJ}}, respectively). ''U'' and ''J'' are sometimes extracted from constrained-LSDA calculations. | :In practice these integrals are therefore often treated as parameters, ''i.e.'', adjusted to reach agreement with experiment in some sense: equilibrium volume, magnetic moment, band gap, structure. They are normally specified in terms of the effective on-site Coulomb- and exchange parameters, ''U'' and ''J'' ({{TAG|LDAUU}} and {{TAG|LDAUJ}}, respectively). ''U'' and ''J'' are sometimes extracted from constrained-LSDA calculations. | ||
:These translate into values for the Slater integrals in the following way (as implemented in VASP at the moment): | :These translate into values for the Slater integrals in the following way (as implemented in VASP at the moment): | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
:where the Hartree-Fock like interaction replaces the L(S)DA on site due to the fact that one subtracts a double counting energy <math>E_{\mathrm{dc}}</math>, which supposedly equals the on site L(S)DA contribution to the total energy, | :where the Hartree-Fock like interaction replaces the L(S)DA on site due to the fact that one subtracts a double counting energy <math>E_{\mathrm{dc}}</math>, which supposedly equals the on-site L(S)DA contribution to the total energy, | ||
::<math> | ::<math> | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
\frac{J}{2} \sum_\sigma {\hat n}^\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}({\hat n}^\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}-1). | \frac{J}{2} \sum_\sigma {\hat n}^\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}({\hat n}^\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}-1). | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
*{{TAG|LDAUTYPE}}=2: The simplified (rotationally invariant) approach to the LSDA+U, introduced by Dudarev ''et al.''<ref name="dudarev:prb:98"/> | *{{TAG|LDAUTYPE}}=2: The simplified (rotationally invariant) approach to the LSDA+U, introduced by Dudarev ''et al.''<ref name="dudarev:prb:98"/> | ||
:This flavour of LSDA+U is of the following form: | |||
::<math> | |||
E_{\mathrm{LSDA+U}}=E_{\mathrm{LSDA}}+\frac{(U-J)}{2}\sum_\sigma \left[ | |||
\left(\sum_{m_1} n_{m_1,m_1}^{\sigma}\right) - \left(\sum_{m_1,m_2} | |||
\hat n_{m_1,m_2}^{\sigma} \hat n_{m_2,m_1}^{\sigma} \right) \right]. | |||
</math> | |||
:This can be understood as adding a penalty functional to the LSDA total energy expression that forces the on-site occupancy matrix in the direction of idempotency, | |||
::<math>\hat n^{\sigma} = \hat n^{\sigma} \hat n^{\sigma}</math>. | |||
:Real matrices are only idempotent when their eigenvalues are either 1 or 0, which for an occupancy matrix translates to either fully occupied or fully unoccupied levels. | |||
:'''Note''': in Dudarev's approach the parameters ''U'' and ''J'' do not enter seperately, only the difference (''U''-''J'') is meaningfull. | |||
*{{TAG|LDAUTYPE}}=4: same as {{TAG|LDAUTYPE}}=1, but LDA+U instead of LSDA+U (i.e. no LSDA exchange splitting). | *{{TAG|LDAUTYPE}}=4: same as {{TAG|LDAUTYPE}}=1, but LDA+U instead of LSDA+U (i.e. no LSDA exchange splitting). | ||
:In the LDA+U case the double counting energy is given by, | |||
::<math> | |||
E_{\mathrm{dc}}(\hat n) = \frac{U}{2} {\hat n}_{\mathrm{tot}}({\hat n}_{\mathrm{tot}}-1) - | |||
\frac{J}{2} \sum_\sigma {\hat n}^\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}({\hat n}^\sigma_{\mathrm{tot}}-1). | |||
</math> | |||
== Related Tags and Sections == | == Related Tags and Sections == |
Revision as of 20:40, 1 March 2011
LDAUTYPE = 1 | 2 | 4
Default: LDAUTYPE = 2
Description: LDAUTYPE specifies which type of L(S)DA+U approach will be used.
- and is determined by the PAW on-site occupancies
- and the (unscreened) on-site electron-electron interaction
- where |m⟩ are real spherical harmonics of angular momentum L=LDAUL.
- The unscreened e-e interaction Uγ1γ3γ2γ4 can be written in terms of the Slater integrals , , , and (f-electrons). Using values for the Slater integrals calculated from atomic orbitals, however, would lead to a large overestimation of the true e-e interaction, since in solids the Coulomb interaction is screened (especially ).
- In practice these integrals are therefore often treated as parameters, i.e., adjusted to reach agreement with experiment in some sense: equilibrium volume, magnetic moment, band gap, structure. They are normally specified in terms of the effective on-site Coulomb- and exchange parameters, U and J (LDAUU and LDAUJ, respectively). U and J are sometimes extracted from constrained-LSDA calculations.
- These translate into values for the Slater integrals in the following way (as implemented in VASP at the moment):
- - -
- The essence of the L(S)DA+U method consists of the assumption that one may now write the total energy as:
- where the Hartree-Fock like interaction replaces the L(S)DA on site due to the fact that one subtracts a double counting energy , which supposedly equals the on-site L(S)DA contribution to the total energy,
- LDAUTYPE=2: The simplified (rotationally invariant) approach to the LSDA+U, introduced by Dudarev et al.[2]
- This flavour of LSDA+U is of the following form:
- This can be understood as adding a penalty functional to the LSDA total energy expression that forces the on-site occupancy matrix in the direction of idempotency,
- .
- Real matrices are only idempotent when their eigenvalues are either 1 or 0, which for an occupancy matrix translates to either fully occupied or fully unoccupied levels.
- Note: in Dudarev's approach the parameters U and J do not enter seperately, only the difference (U-J) is meaningfull.
- In the LDA+U case the double counting energy is given by,
Related Tags and Sections
LDAU, LDAUL, LDAUU, LDAUJ, LDAUPRINT