Graphite interlayer distance: Difference between revisions
Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
[http://www.vasp.at/vasp-workshop/examples/graphiteDistance_ts.tgz graphiteDistance_ts.tgz] | [http://www.vasp.at/vasp-workshop/examples/graphiteDistance_ts.tgz graphiteDistance_ts.tgz] | ||
{{Template:Bulk_systems}} | |||
Back to the [[The_VASP_Manual|main page]]. | |||
[[Category:Examples]] | [[Category:Examples]] |
Revision as of 11:05, 10 August 2017
Task
Determine the interlayer distance of graphite in the stacking direction using the method of Tchatchenko and Scheffler to account for van der Waals interactions.
Input
POSCAR
graphite 1.0 1.22800000 -2.12695839 0.00000000 1.22800000 2.12695839 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.00000000 7.0 4 direct 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.25000000 0.00000000 0.00000000 0.75000000 0.33333333 0.66666667 0.25000000 0.66666667 0.33333333 0.75000000
INCAR
IVDW = 20 LVDW_EWALD =.TRUE. NSW = 1 IBRION = 2 ISIF = 4 PREC = Accurate EDIFFG = 1e-5 LWAVE = .FALSE. LCHARG = .FALSE. ISMEAR = -5 SIGMA = 0.01 EDIFF = 1e-6 ALGO = Fast NPAR = 2
KPOINTS
Monkhorst Pack 0 gamma 16 16 8 0 0 0
Calcualtion
Semilocal DFT at the GGA level underestimates long-range dispersion interactions. This problem causes a bad overestimation of graphite lattice in the stacking direction (8.84 A (PBE) vs. 6.71 A (exp)).
In this example, dispersion correction method of Tchatchenko and Scheffler (see Tkatchenko-Scheffler method) is used to cope with this problem.
Optimal length of the lattice vector c normal to the stacking direction is determined in a series of single point calculations with varied value of c (all other degrees of freedom are fixed at their experimental values).
The computed c vs. energy dependence is written in the file results.dat and can be visualized e.g. using xmgrace. The optimal value can be obtained using the attached utility (python with numpy or Numeric is needed):
./utilities/fit.py results.dat
200 iterations performed Ch-square: 4.30305519481e-09 --------- E0(eV): -37.433456779 d0(A): 6.65603352689
The computed value of 6.66 A agrees well with experiment (6.71 A).
Download
Back to the main page.