Graphite interlayer distance: Difference between revisions

From VASP Wiki
Line 85: Line 85:
[http://www.vasp.at/vasp-workshop/examples/graphiteDistance_ts.tgz graphiteDistance_ts.tgz]
[http://www.vasp.at/vasp-workshop/examples/graphiteDistance_ts.tgz graphiteDistance_ts.tgz]


----
{{Template:Bulk_systems}}
[[VASP tutorials|To the list of examples]] or to the [[The_VASP_Manual|main page]]
 
Back to the [[The_VASP_Manual|main page]].


[[Category:Examples]]
[[Category:Examples]]

Revision as of 11:05, 10 August 2017

Task

Determine the interlayer distance of graphite in the stacking direction using the method of Tchatchenko and Scheffler to account for van der Waals interactions.

Input

POSCAR

graphite
1.0
1.22800000 -2.12695839  0.00000000
1.22800000  2.12695839  0.00000000
0.00000000  0.00000000  7.0
4
direct
   0.00000000  0.00000000  0.25000000
   0.00000000  0.00000000  0.75000000
   0.33333333  0.66666667  0.25000000
   0.66666667  0.33333333  0.75000000

INCAR

IVDW = 20           
LVDW_EWALD =.TRUE. 
NSW = 1 
IBRION = 2
ISIF = 4
PREC = Accurate
EDIFFG = 1e-5
LWAVE = .FALSE.
LCHARG = .FALSE.
ISMEAR = -5
SIGMA = 0.01
EDIFF = 1e-6
ALGO = Fast
NPAR = 2

KPOINTS

Monkhorst Pack
0
gamma
16 16 8
0 0 0

Calcualtion

Semilocal DFT at the GGA level underestimates long-range dispersion interactions. This problem causes a bad overestimation of graphite lattice in the stacking direction (8.84 A (PBE) vs. 6.71 A (exp)).

In this example, dispersion correction method of Tchatchenko and Scheffler (see Tkatchenko-Scheffler method) is used to cope with this problem.

Optimal length of the lattice vector c normal to the stacking direction is determined in a series of single point calculations with varied value of c (all other degrees of freedom are fixed at their experimental values).

The computed c vs. energy dependence is written in the file results.dat and can be visualized e.g. using xmgrace. The optimal value can be obtained using the attached utility (python with numpy or Numeric is needed):

./utilities/fit.py results.dat

200 iterations performed
Ch-square: 4.30305519481e-09
---------

       E0(eV):         -37.433456779
       d0(A):  6.65603352689

The computed value of 6.66 A agrees well with experiment (6.71 A).

Download

graphiteDistance_ts.tgz

Back to the main page.