Nonlocal vdW-DF functionals: Difference between revisions

From VASP Wiki
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 84: Line 84:
*vdW-DF3-opt2 of Chakraborty ''et al.'' {{cite|chakraborty:jctc:2020}}:
*vdW-DF3-opt2 of Chakraborty ''et al.'' {{cite|chakraborty:jctc:2020}}:
  {{TAGBL|GGA}}      = MK
  {{TAGBL|GGA}}      = MK
  {{TAGBL|PARAM1}}    = 0.1234567901
  {{TAGBL|PARAM1}}    = 0.1234568
  {{TAGBL|PARAM2}}    = 0.58
  {{TAGBL|PARAM2}}    = 0.58
  {{TAGBL|AGGAC}}    = 0.0
  {{TAGBL|AGGAC}}    = 0.0

Revision as of 13:52, 30 January 2024

The vdW-DF method originally proposed by Dion et al.[1] consists of a semilocal exchange-correlation functional that is augmented with a nonlocal correlation functional that approximately accounts for dispersion interactions. In VASP, the nonlocal functional is implemented using the algorithm of Román-Pérez and Soler[2] that is based on FFTs and the convolution theorem to calculate efficiently the double real-space integral. Several versions of the vdW-DF functionals proposed in the literature can be used (see list below).

The vdW-DF functionals are available since the 5.2.12.26May2011 version of VASP for the calculation of total energies and forces. The stress tensor calculation for the cell optimization (ISIF=3}) is available since the VASP 5.2.12.11Nov2011 version for spin-unpolarized systems and VASP 5.3.1 for spin-polarized systems. They have been implemented by J. Klimeš. If you make use of the vdW-DF functionals presented in this section, we ask you to cite Ref. [3]. Please also cite the original vdW-DF paper of Dion et al.[1] and the paper of Román-Pérez and Soler[2].

An overview of the performance of the vdW-DF functionals can be found for instance in Ref. [3][4][5].

List of nonlocal vdW-DF functionals

  • To add a nonlocal correlation energy to the semilocal exchange-correlation energy (selected with the GGA or METAGGA tag) one needs to set LUSE_VDW=.TRUE. in the INCAR file.
  • Note that for all vdW-DF functionals listed below except rVV10 and SCAN+rVV10, the GGA component of the semilocal (PBE) correlation needs to be removed (with AGGAC=0.0), so that only LDA correlation is left.
  • In the vdW-DF2 and rev-vdW-DF2 functionals, the nonlocal correlation consists of the Dion et al. functional, but with the parameter that is changed from -0.8491 (the default value in VASP) to -1.8867 by setting ZAB_VDW=-1.8867.
  • Since vdW-DF functionals tend to yield less spherical densities than standard GGA functionals, it is recommended to set LASPH=.TRUE. to get reasonably accurate contributions from the spheres around the atoms.
Mind:
  • In versions of VASP prior to 6.4.0, a meta-GGA functional (e.g., SCAN) could be combined only with the rVV10 nonlocal functional. Conversely, a GGA functional could be combined only with the original nonlocal functional of Dion et al.. This restriction is lifted since VASP.6.4.0 thanks to the introduction of the IVDW_NL tag.
  • Since VASP.6.4.0, the spin-polarized formulation of the nonlocal vdW correlation term[6] is available. It can be switched on with the logical tag LSPIN_VDW (.FALSE. by default), however its use is limited to the the functional of Dion et al. (not available for rVV10) and only when the nonlocal term is combined with a GGA functional. In other cases (and in prior versions of VASP), the nonlocal correlation functional is evaluated with the sum of the spin-up and spin-down electron densities.
  • In VASP.6.2 (and prior versions) the stress tensor is broken for rVV10 (it is correct for other vdW-DF though). From VASP.6.3.0 onwards, the stress tensor for rVV10 is correct.

Examples of INCAR files are shown below.

  • Original vdW-DF of Dion et al.[1]:
GGA       = RE
AGGAC     = 0.0
LUSE_VDW  = .TRUE.
LASPH     = .TRUE.
  • vdW-DF2 of Lee et al. (2nd version of vdW-DF)[7]:
GGA       = ML
AGGAC     = 0.0
LUSE_VDW  = .TRUE.
ZAB_VDW   = -1.8867 # the default is -0.8491
LASPH     = .TRUE.
  • optPBE-vdW of Klimeš et al.[8]:
GGA       = OR
AGGAC     = 0.0
LUSE_VDW  = .TRUE.
LASPH     = .TRUE.
  • optB88-vdW of Klimeš et al.[8]:
GGA       = BO
PARAM1    = 0.1833333333
PARAM2    = 0.22
AGGAC     = 0.0
LUSE_VDW  = .TRUE.
LASPH     = .TRUE.
  • optB86b-vdW of Klimeš et al.[3]:
GGA       = MK 
PARAM1    = 0.1234 
PARAM2    = 1.0
AGGAC     = 0.0
LUSE_VDW  = .TRUE.
LASPH     = .TRUE.
  • rev-vdW-DF2 (also known as vdW-DF2-B86R) of Hamada[9]:
GGA       = MK
PARAM1    = 0.1234568 # ~10/81
PARAM2    = 0.7114
AGGAC     = 0.0
LUSE_VDW  = .TRUE.
ZAB_VDW   = -1.8867 # the default is -0.8491
LASPH     = .TRUE.
  • vdW-DF-cx of Berland and Hyldgaard:
GGA       = CX
AGGAC     = 0.0
LUSE_VDW  = .TRUE.
LASPH     = .TRUE.
  • vdW-DF3-opt1 of Chakraborty et al. [10]:
GGA       = BO
PARAM1    = 0.1122334456
PARAM2    = 0.1234568
AGGAC     = 0.0
LUSE_VDW  = .TRUE.
IVDW_NL   = 3
ALPHA_VDW = 0.94950 # default for IVDW_NL=3 but can be overwritten by this tag
GAMMA_VDW = 1.12    # default for IVDW_NL=3 but can be overwritten by this tag
LASPH     = .TRUE.
  • vdW-DF3-opt2 of Chakraborty et al. [10]:
GGA       = MK
PARAM1    = 0.1234568
PARAM2    = 0.58
AGGAC     = 0.0
LUSE_VDW  = .TRUE.
IVDW_NL   = 4
ALPHA_VDW = 0.28248 # default for IVDW_NL=4 but can be overwritten by this tag
GAMMA_VDW = 1.29    # default for IVDW_NL=4 but can be overwritten by this tag
LASPH     = .TRUE.
  • rVV10 of Sabatini et al. [11]:
GGA       = ML
LUSE_VDW  = .TRUE.
IVDW_NL   = 2
BPARAM    = 6.3     # default but can be overwritten by this tag
CPARAM    = 0.0093  # default but can be overwritten by this tag
LASPH     = .TRUE.
  • SCAN+rVV10 of Peng et al. :
METAGGA   = SCAN
LUSE_VDW  = .TRUE.
BPARAM    = 15.7    # the default value is 6.3
CPARAM    = 0.0093  # default but can be overwritten by this tag
LASPH     = .TRUE.
  • rSCAN+rVV10 of Ning et al. [12]:
METAGGA   = R2SCAN
LUSE_VDW  = .TRUE.
BPARAM    = 11.95   # the default value is 6.3
CPARAM    = 0.0093  # default but can be overwritten by this tag
LASPH     = .TRUE.


Important technical remarks

  • The calculation of the nonlocal correlation functional of Dion et al. (used when IVDW_NL=1, which means for all functionals listed above except rVV10, SCAN+rVV10 and rSCAN+rVV10) requires a precalculated kernel which is distributed via the VASP download portal (vdw_kernel.bindat.gz has to be decompressed). If VASP does not find this file, the kernel will be calculated, which is however rather demanding. The kernel needs to be either copied to the VASP run directory for each calculation or can be stored in a central location and read from there. The location needs to be set in routine PHI_GENERATE. This does not work on some clusters and the kernel needs to be copied into the run directory in such cases. The distributed file uses little endian convention and won't be read on big endian machines. The big endian version of the file is available from the VASP team. In the case of the rVV10 nonlocal correlation functional, no precalculated kernel is required and it is calculated on the fly, which is however not as demanding as in the case of the functional of Dion et al..
  • There are no special POTCAR files for the vdW-DF functionals and the PBE or LDA POTCAR files can be used. Currently the evaluation of the nonlocal correlation functional is not done fully within the PAW method, but the sum of the pseudo-valence density and partial core density is used. This approximation works rather well, as is discussed in [3], and the accuracy generally increases when the number of valence electrons is increased or when harder PAW datasets are used. For example, for adsorption it is recommended to compare the adsorption energy obtained with standard PAW datasets and more-electron POTCAR files for both PBE calculations and vdW-DF calculations to assess the quality of the results.
  • The evaluation of the nonlocal correlation energy requires some additional time. Most of it is spent on performing FFTs to evaluate the energy and potential. Thus the additional time is determined by the number of FFT grid points, basically the size of the simulation cell. It is almost independent on the number of the atoms in the cell. Thus the relative cost of the vdW-DF method depends on the "filling" of the cell and increases with the amount of vacuum in the cell. The relative increase is high for isolated molecules in large cells, but small for solids in smaller cells with many k-points.

Related Tags and Sections

LUSE_VDW, IVDW_NL, LSPIN_VDW, ZAB_VDW, BPARAM, CPARAM, GGA, AGGAC, PARAM1, PARAM2, METAGGA

See also the alternative atom-pairwise and many-body dispersion methods: IVDW

References

  1. ↑ a b c M. Dion, H. Rydberg, E. Schröder, D. C. Langreth, and B. I. Lundqvist, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 246401 (2004).
  2. ↑ a b G. Román-Pérez and J. M. Soler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 096102 (2009).
  3. ↑ a b c d J. Klimeš, D. R. Bowler, and A. Michaelides, Phys. Rev. B 83, 195131 (2011).
  4. ↑ K. Berland, V. R. Cooper, K. Lee, E. Schröder, T. Thonhauser, P. Hyldgaard, and B. I. Lundqvist, Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 066501 (2015).
  5. ↑ F. Tran, L. Kalantari, B. Traoré, X. Rocquefelte, and P. Blaha, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3, 0637602 (2019).
  6. ↑ T. Thonhauser, S. Zuluaga, C. A. Arter, K. Berland, E. Schröder, and P. Hyldgaard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 136402 (2015).
  7. ↑ K. Lee, E. D. Murray, L. Kong, B. I. Lundqvist, and D. C. Langreth, Phys. Rev. B 82, 081101(R) (2010).
  8. ↑ a b J. Klimeš, D. R. Bowler, and A. Michaelides, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 22, 022201 (2010).
  9. ↑ I. Hamada, Phys. Rev. B 89, 121103 (2014).
  10. ↑ a b D. Chakraborty, K. Berland, and T. Thonhauser, Next-Generation Nonlocal van der Waals Density Functional, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16, 5893 (2020).
  11. ↑ R. Sabatini, T. Gorni, and S. de Gironcoli, Phys. Rev. B 87, 041108(R) (2013).
  12. ↑ J. Ning, M. Kothakonda, J. W. Furness, A. D. Kaplan, S. Ehlert, J. G. Brandenburg, J. P. Perdew, and J. Sun, Workhorse minimally empirical dispersion-corrected density functional with tests for weakly bound systems: rSCAN+rVV⁢10, Phys. Rev. B 106, 075422 (2022).


Retrieved from "https://www.vasp.at/wiki/index.php?title=Nonlocal_vdW-DF_functionals&oldid=23217"