Bethe-Salpeter-equations calculations: Difference between revisions

From VASP Wiki
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
VASP offers a powerful module for solving time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) and
VASP offers a powerful module for solving the Bethe-Salpeter (BSE) equation{{cite|albrecht:prl:98}}{{cite|rohlfing:prl:98}}. The BSE can be used for obtaining the frequency-dependent dielectric function with the excitonic effects and can be based on the ground-state electronic structure in the DFT, hybrid-functional or ''GW'' approximations.   
time-dependent Hartree-Fock equations (TDHF) (the Casida equation) or the
Bethe-Salpeter (BSE) equation{{cite|albrecht:prl:98}}{{cite|rohlfing:prl:98}}.
These approaches are used for obtaining the frequency-dependent dielectric
function with the excitonic effects and can be based on the ground-state electronic
structure in the DFT, hybrid-functional or ''GW'' approximations.   


__TOC__
__TOC__


== Solving Bethe-Salpeter and Casida equations ==
== Solving Bethe-Salpeter equation ==
To take into account the excitonic effects or the electron-hole interaction,
To take into account the excitonic effects or the electron-hole interaction, one has to use approximations beyond the independent-particle (IP) and the random-phase approximations ([[RPA/ACFDT: Correlation energy in the Random Phase Approximation|RPA]]). In VASP, it is done via the algorithm selected by {{TAG|ALGO}} = BSE. These essentially solves the same equations (Casida/Bethe-Salpeter) but differ in the way the screening of the Coulomb potential is treated. The TDHF approach uses the exact-correlation kernel <math>f_{\rm xc}</math>, whereas BSE requires the <math>W(\omega \to 0)</math> from a preceding ''GW '' calculation. Thus, in order to perform  TDHF or BSE calculations, one has to provide the ground-state orbitals ({{FILE|WAVECAR}}) and the derivatives of the orbitals with respect to <math>k</math> ({{FILE|WAVEDER}}). In addition, the BSE calculation requires files storing the screened Coulomb kernel produced in a ''GW'' calculation, i.e., {{FILE|Wxxxx.tmp}}.
one has to use approximations beyond the independent-particle (IP) and the
random-phase approximations (RPA). In VASP, it is done via the algorithm selected
by {{TAG|ALGO}} = BSE or {{TAG|ALGO}} = TDHF, which essentially solves the same equations  
(Casida/Bethe-Salpeter) but mainly differ in the
way the screening of the Coulomb potential is treated. The TDHF approach uses
the exact-correlation kernel <math>f_{\rm xc}</math>, whereas BSE requires the
<math>W(\omega \to 0)</math> from a preceding ''GW '' calculation. Thus, in order to
perform  TDHF or BSE calculations, one has to provide the ground-state
wavefunctions ({{FILE|WAVECAR}}) and the derivatives of the orbitals with
respect to <math>k</math> ({{FILE|WAVEDER}}). In addition, the BSE calculation
requires files storing the screened Coulomb kernel produced in a ''GW'' calculation,
i.e. {{FILE|WXXXX.tmp}}.


Both TDHF and BSE approaches require a preceding ground-state calculation,
In summary, both TDHF and BSE approaches require a preceding ground-state calculation, however, the TDHF does not need the preceding ''GW'' and can be performed with the DFT or hybrid-functional orbitals and energies.
however, the TDHF does not need the preceding ''GW'' and can be
performed with the DFT or hybrid-functional orbitals and energies.


== Time-dependent Hartree-Fock ==
== Bethe-Salpeter equation calculation ==
The TDHF calculations can be performed in two steps: the ground-state
The BSE calculations require a preceding ''GW'' step to determine the screened Coulomb kernel <math>W_{GG'}(q,\omega \to 0 )</math>.  The details on ''GW'' calculations can be found in the practical guide to [[Practical guide to GW calculations|''GW'' ]]  calculations. Here, we note that during the ''GW'' calculation, VASP writes this kernel into the following files
calculation and the optical absorption calculation. For example, optical
absorption of bulk Si can be performed with a hybrid-functional electronic
structure, where the number of bands is increased to include the relevant
conduction bands:
 
{{TAG|SYSTEM}}    = Si
{{TAG|ISMEAR}}    = 0
{{TAG|SIGMA}}    = 0.05
{{TAG|NBANDS}}    = 16      ! or any larger desired value
{{TAG|ALGO}}      = D      ! Damped algorithm often required for HF type calculations, {{TAG|ALGO}} = Normal might work as well
{{TAG|LHFCALC}}  = .TRUE.
{{TAG|AEXX}}      = 0.3
{{TAG|HFSCREEN}}  = 0.2
{{TAG|LOPTICS}}  = .TRUE.  ! can also be done in an additional intermediate step
 
In the second step, the dielectric function is evaluated by solving the Casida equation
 
{{TAG|SYSTEM}}    = Si
{{TAG|ISMEAR}}    = 0
{{TAG|SIGMA}}    = 0.05
{{TAG|NBANDS}}    = 16   
{{TAG|ALGO}}      = TDHF
{{TAG|AEXX}}      = 0.3
{{TAG|HFSCREEN}}  = 0.2
 
THDF/BSE calculations can be performed for non-spin-polarized, spin-polarized,
as well as noncollinear (spin-orbit) cases. There is, however, one caveat. The
local exchange-correlation kernel is approximated by the density-density part
only. This makes predictions for spin-polarized systems less accurate than for
non-spin-polarized systems.
 
== Time-dependent DFT ==
Within the TD-DFT approximation, the Fock exchange is not included in the exchange-correlation
kernel and the ladder diagrams are not taken into account. Hence, only the local
contributions in <math>f_{\rm xc}</math> are present
 
{{TAG|SYSTEM}}    = Si
{{TAG|ISMEAR}}    = 0
{{TAG|SIGMA}}    = 0.05
{{TAG|NBANDS}}    = 16   
{{TAG|ALGO}}      = TDHF
{{TAG|LFXC}}      = .TRUE.
{{TAG|AEXX}}      = 0.0
 
Since the ladder diagrams are not included in the TD-DFT calculation,
the resulting dielectric function lacks the excitonic effects.
{{NB|warning| Currently, the local <math>f_{\rm xc}</math> is only evaluated in the LDA approximation.|}}
 
== Bethe-Salpeter equation ==
The BSE calculations require a preceding ''GW'' step to determine the screened
Coulomb kernel <math>W_{GG'}(q,\omega \to 0 )</math>.  The details on ''GW''  
calculations can be found in the practical guide to ''GW'' calculations. Here, we
note that during the ''GW'' calculation, VASP writes this kernel into the following
files


  W0001.tmp, W0002.tmp, ..., W{NKPTS}.tmp
  W0001.tmp, W0002.tmp, ..., W{NKPTS}.tmp
Line 90: Line 17:
  WFULL0001.tmp, WFULL0002.tmp, ..., WFULL{NKPTS}.tmp.
  WFULL0001.tmp, WFULL0002.tmp, ..., WFULL{NKPTS}.tmp.


The files {{FILE|W000?}}.tmp store only the diagonal terms of the kernel and are
The files {{FILE|Wxxxx.tmp}} store only the diagonal terms of the kernel and are fairly small, whereas the files {{TAG|WFULLxxxx.tmp}} store the full matrix. It is important to make sure in the ''GW'' step that the flag {{TAG|LWAVE}} = .TRUE. is set, so that the {{FILE|WAVECAR}} stores the one-electron ''GW'' energies and the one-electron orbitals, if the ''GW'' calculation is self-consistent.
fairly small, whereas the files {{TAG|WFULL000}}?.tmp store the full matrix. It
is important to make sure in the ''GW'' step that the flag {{TAG|LWAVE}} = .TRUE.
is set, so that the {{FILE|WAVECAR}} stores the one-electron ''GW'' energies and the
one-electron orbitals, if the ''GW'' calculation is self-consistent.


For the self-consistent ''GW'' calculations the following flags should be added
For the self-consistent ''GW'' calculations the following flags should be added
Line 101: Line 24:
  {{TAG|LPEAD}}    = .TRUE.
  {{TAG|LPEAD}}    = .TRUE.


in order to update the {{FILE|WAVEDER}} using finite differences ({{TAG|LPEAD}}
in order to update the {{FILE|WAVEDER}} using finite differences ({{TAG|LPEAD}} = .TRUE.). The type of ''GW'' calculation is selected with the {{TAG|ALGO}} tag, which is discussed in great detail in  the practical guide to ''GW'' calculations.
= .TRUE.). The type of ''GW'' calculation is selected with the {{TAG|ALGO}} tag,
which is discussed in great detail in  the practical guide to ''GW'' calculations.


Once the ''GW'' step is completed, the BSE calculation can be performed using the following setup
Once the ''GW'' step is completed, the BSE calculation can be performed using the following setup
Line 118: Line 39:
Considering that quasiparticle energies in ''GW'' converge very slowly with the number of unoccupied bands and require large {{TAG|NBANDS}}, the number of bands included in the BSE calculation should be restricted explicitly by setting the occupied and unoccupied bands ({{TAG|NBANDSO}} and {{TAG|NBANDSV}}) included in the BSE Hamiltonian.
Considering that quasiparticle energies in ''GW'' converge very slowly with the number of unoccupied bands and require large {{TAG|NBANDS}}, the number of bands included in the BSE calculation should be restricted explicitly by setting the occupied and unoccupied bands ({{TAG|NBANDSO}} and {{TAG|NBANDSV}}) included in the BSE Hamiltonian.


VASP tries to use sensible defaults, but it is highly recommended to check the
VASP tries to use sensible defaults, but it is highly recommended to check the {{FILE|OUTCAR}} file and make sure that the right bands are included.  The tag {{TAG|OMEGAMAX}} specifies the maximum excitation energy of included electron-hole pairs and the pairs with the one-electron energy difference beyond this limit are not included in the BSE Hamiltonian.  Hint: The convergence with respect to {{TAG|NBANDSV}} and {{TAG|OMEGAMAX}} should be thoroughly checked as the real part of the dielectric function, as well as the correlation energy, is usually very sensitive to these values, whereas the imaginary part of the dielectric function converges quickly.
{{FILE|OUTCAR}} file and make sure that the right bands are included.  The tag
{{TAG|OMEGAMAX}} specifies the maximum excitation energy of included
electron-hole pairs and the pairs with the one-electron energy difference beyond
this limit are not included in the BSE Hamiltonian.  Hint: The convergence with
respect to {{TAG|NBANDSV}} and {{TAG|OMEGAMAX}} should be thoroughly checked as
the real part of the dielectric function, as well as the correlation energy, is
usually very sensitive to these values, whereas the imaginary part of the
dielectric function converges quickly.


At the beginning of the BSE calculation, VASP will try to read the
At the beginning of the BSE calculation, VASP will try to read the {{FILE|WFULLxxxx.tmp}} files and if these files are not found, VASP will read the {{FILE|Wxxxx.tmp}} files. For small isotropic bulk systems, the diagonal approximation of the dielectric screening may be sufficient and yields results very similar to the calculation with the full dielectric tensor {{TAG|WFULLxxxx.tmp}}. Nevertheless, for molecules and atoms as well as surfaces, the full-screened Coulomb kernel is strictly required.
{{TAG|WFULL000}}?.tmp files and if these files are not found, VASP will read the
{{TAG|W000}}?.tmp files. For small isotropic bulk systems, the diagonal
approximation of the dielectric screening may be sufficient and yields results
very similar to the calculation with the full dielectric tensor
{{TAG|WFULL000}}?.tmp. Nevertheless, for molecules and atoms as well as
surfaces, the full screened Coulomb kernel is strictly required.


Both TDHF and BSE approaches write the calculated frequency-dependent dielectric
Both TDHF and BSE approaches write the calculated frequency-dependent dielectric function as well as the excitonic energies in the {{TAG|vasprun.xml}} file.
function as well as the excitonic energies in the {{TAG|vasprun.xml}} file.


== Calculations beyond Tamm-Dancoff approximation ==
== Model BSE (mBSE) ==
The TDHF and BSE calculations beyond the Tamm-Dancoff approximation (TDA){{cite|sander:prb:15}} can be performed by setting the  
BSE calculations can be performed using a model dielectric function{{cite|bokdam:scr:2016}}{{cite|tal:prr:2020}}. In this approach the calculation of the screened Coulomb potential is not required. Instead, the model dielectric function can be used to describe the screening of the Coulomb potential by setting the tag {{TAG|LMODELHF}} with parameters {{TAG|AEXX}} and {{TAG|HFSCREEN}}.
{{TAG|ANTIRES}} = 2 in the {{TAG|INCAR}} file
 
Model BSE calculation can be performed the following steps:
# ground-state calculation
# GW calculation (optional in model BSE calculation)
# optical absorption calculation via model BSE
 
For example, an optical absorption calculation of bulk Si can be performed using a model dielectric function as described in Ref. {{cite|tal:prr:2020}}.
 
{{TAG|SYSTEM}}    = Si
{{TAG|ISMEAR}}   = 0
{{TAG|SIGMA}}    = 0.05
{{TAG|NBANDS}}    = 16      ! or any larger desired value
{{TAG|ALGO}}      = D      ! Damped algorithm often required for HF type calculations, {{TAG|ALGO}} = Normal might work as well
{{TAG|LHFCALC}}  = .TRUE.
{{TAG|LMODELHF}}  = .TRUE.
{{TAG|AEXX}}      = 0.083
{{TAG|HFSCREEN}}  = 1.22
{{TAG|LOPTICS}}   = .TRUE.  ! can also be done in an additional intermediate step
 
In the second step, the dielectric function is evaluated by solving the Casida equation


  {{TAG|SYSTEM}}    = Si
  {{TAG|SYSTEM}}    = Si
{{TAG|NBANDS}}    = same as in GW calculation
  {{TAG|ISMEAR}}    = 0  
  {{TAG|ISMEAR}}    = 0
  {{TAG|SIGMA}}    = 0.05
  {{TAG|SIGMA}}    = 0.05
  {{TAG|ALGO}}      = BSE   
{{TAG|NBANDS}}    = 16   
  {{TAG|ANTIRES}}   = 2   ! beyond Tamm-Dancoff  
  {{TAG|ALGO}}      = TDHF
  {{TAG|NBANDSO}}   = 4  
{{TAG|IBSE}}      = 0
  {{TAG|NBANDSV}}   = 8
{{TAG|NBANDSO}}  = 4      ! number of occupied bands
{{TAG|NBANDSV}}  = 8      ! number of unoccupied bands
{{TAG|LHARTREE}}  = .TRUE.
{{TAG|LADDER}}    = .TRUE.
{{TAG|LFXC}}      = .FALSE. ! local xc kernel is disabled in mBSE
{{TAG|LMODELHF}}  = .TRUE.
{{TAG|AEXX}}      = 0.083
{{TAG|HFSCREEN}}  = 1.22
 
== Calculations beyond Tamm-Dancoff approximation ==
The TDHF and BSE calculations beyond the Tamm-Dancoff approximation (TDA){{cite|sander:prb:15}} can be performed by setting the {{TAG|ANTIRES}} = 2 in the {{TAG|INCAR}} file
 
{{TAG|SYSTEM}}      = Si
{{TAG|NBANDS}}      = same as in GW calculation
{{TAG|ISMEAR}}      = 0
{{TAG|SIGMA}}        = 0.05
{{TAG|ALGO}}        = BSE   
  {{TAG|ANTIRES}}     = 2     ! beyond Tamm-Dancoff
{{TAG|LORBITALREAL}} = .TRUE.
  {{TAG|NBANDSO}}     = 4  
  {{TAG|NBANDSV}}     = 8


The flag {{TAG|LORBITALREAL}} = .TRUE. forces VASP to make the orbitals <math>
The flag {{TAG|LORBITALREAL}} = .TRUE. forces VASP to make the orbitals <math> \phi({\bf r}) </math> real valued at the Gamma point as well as k-points at the edges of the Brillouin zone. This can improve the performance of BSE/TDHF calculations but it should be used consistently with the ground-state calculation.
\phi({\bf r}) </math> real valued at the Gamma point as well as k-points at the
edges of the Brillouin zone. This can improve the performance of BSE/TDHF
calculations but it should be used consistently with the ground-state calculation.


== Calculations at finite wavevectors ==
== Calculations at finite wavevectors ==
VASP can also calculate the dielectric function at a <math>{\bf q}</math>-vector
VASP can also calculate the dielectric function at a <math>{\bf q}</math>-vector compatible with the k-point grid (finite-momentum excitons).  
compatible with the k-point grid (finite-momentum excitons).  


  {{TAG|SYSTEM}}      = Si
  {{TAG|SYSTEM}}      = Si
Line 172: Line 112:
  {{TAG|NBANDSV}}      = 8
  {{TAG|NBANDSV}}      = 8


The tag {{TAG|KPOINT_BSE}} sets the <math>{\bf q}</math>-point and the shift at
The tag {{TAG|KPOINT_BSE}} sets the <math>{\bf q}</math>-point and the shift at which the dielectric function is calculated. The first integer specifies the index of the <math>{\bf q}</math>-point and the other three values shift the provided <math>{\bf q}</math>-point by an arbitrary reciprocal vector <math> \bf G</math>.  The reciprocal lattice vector is supplied by three integer values <math> n_i</math> with <math> {\bf G}= n_1 {\bf G}_1+n_2 {\bf G}_2+n_3 {\bf G}_3</math>.  This feature is only supported as of VASP.6 (in VASP.5 the feature can be enabled, but the results are erroneous).
which the dielectric function is calculated. The first integer specifies the
index of the <math>{\bf q}</math>-point and the other three values shift the
provided <math>{\bf q}</math>-point by an arbitrary reciprocal vector <math> \bf
G</math>.  The reciprocal lattice vector is supplied by three integer values
<math> n_i</math> with <math> {\bf G}= n_1 {\bf G}_1+n_2 {\bf G}_2+n_3 {\bf
G}_3</math>.  This feature is only supported as of VASP.6 (in VASP.5 the feature
can be enabled, but the results are erroneous).
 
== Scaling of the BSE equation ==
The scaling of the BSE/Casida equation strongly limits its application for
large systems. The main limiting factor is the diagonalization of the BSE/TDHF
Hamiltonian. The rank of the Hamiltonian is
 
::<math>N_{\rm rank} = N_k\times N_c\times N_v</math>,
 
where <math>N_k</math> is
the number of k-points in the Brillouin zone and <math>N_c</math> and
<math>N_v</math> are the number of conduction and valence bands, respectively.
The diagonalization of the matrix scales cubically with the matrix rank, i.e.
<math>N_{\rm rank}^3</math>. Despite the fact that this matrix diagonalization is
usually the bottleneck for bigger systems, the construction of the BSE
Hamiltonian also scales unfavorably and can play a dominant role in big
systems, i.e.
 
::<math>N_k\times N_q\times (N_v\times N_v\times N_G\times N_c\times N_c)</math>,
 
where <math>N_q</math> is the number of q-points and <math>N_G</math> number of G-vectors.


== Consistency tests ==
== Consistency tests ==
In order to verify the results obtained in the BSE calculation, one can perform
In order to verify the results obtained in the BSE calculation, one can perform a number of consistency tests.
a number of consistency tests.


=== First test: IP dielectric function ===
=== First test: IP dielectric function ===
The BSE code can be used to reproduce the independent particle spectrum if the
The BSE code can be used to reproduce the independent particle spectrum if the RPA and the ladder diagrams are switched off
RPA and the ladder diagrams are switched off


  {{TAG|LADDER}}  = .FALSE.  
  {{TAG|LADDER}}  = .FALSE.  
  {{TAG|LHARTREE}} = .FALSE.
  {{TAG|LHARTREE}} = .FALSE.


This should yield exactly the same dielectric function as the preceding
This should yield exactly the same dielectric function as the preceding calculation with {{TAG| LOPTICS}} = .TRUE.  We recommend to set the complex shift manually in the BSE as well as the preceding optics calculations, e.g. {{TAG | CSHIFT}} = 0.4.  The dielectric functions produced in these calculations should be identical.
calculation with {{TAG| LOPTICS}} = .TRUE.  We recommend to set the complex
shift manually in the BSE as well as the preceding optics calculations, e.g.
{{TAG | CSHIFT}} = 0.4.  The dielectric functions produced in these calculations
should be identical.


=== Second test: RPA dielectric function ===
=== Second test: RPA dielectric function ===
The RPA/''GW'' dielectric function can be used to verify the correctness of the RPA
The RPA/''GW'' dielectric function can be used to verify the correctness of the RPA dielectric function calculated via the BSE algorithm.  The RPA dielectric function in the BSE code can be calculated by switching off the ladder diagrams while keeping the RPA terms, i.e., the BSE calculation should be performed with the following tags
dielectric function calculated via the BSE algorithm.  The RPA dielectric
function in the BSE code can be calculated by switching off the ladder diagrams
while keeping the RPA terms, i.e., the BSE calculation should be performed with
the following tags


  {{TAG|ANTIRES}}  = 2
  {{TAG|ANTIRES}}  = 2
Line 230: Line 133:
  {{TAG|CSHIFT}}    = 0.4
  {{TAG|CSHIFT}}    = 0.4


The same dielectric function should be obtained via the ''GW'' code by setting these
The same dielectric function should be obtained via the ''GW'' code by setting these flags
flags


  {{TAG|ALGO}}      = CHI  
  {{TAG|ALGO}}      = CHI  
Line 237: Line 139:
  {{TAG|CSHIFT}}    = 0.4
  {{TAG|CSHIFT}}    = 0.4


Make sure that a large {{TAG|CSHIFT}} is selected as the ''GW'' code calculates
Make sure that a large {{TAG|CSHIFT}} is selected as the ''GW'' code calculates the polarizability at very few frequency points. Note that the ''GW'' code does not use the TDA, so {{TAG|ANTIRES}} = 2 is required for the TDHF/BSE calculation. In our experience, the agreement can be made practically perfect provided sufficient frequency points are used and all available occupied and virtual orbitals are included in the BSE step.
the polarizability at very few frequency points. Note that the ''GW''  
code does not use the TDA, so {{TAG|ANTIRES}} = 2 is required for the TDHF/BSE
calculation. In our experience, the agreement can be made practically perfect
provided sufficient frequency points are used and all available occupied and
virtual orbitals are included in the BSE step.


=== Third test: RPA correlation energy ===
=== Third test: RPA correlation energy ===
The BSE code can be used to calculate the correlation energy via the plasmon
The BSE code can be used to calculate the correlation energy via the plasmon equation. This correlation energy can be compared with the [[ACFDT/RPA calculations|RPA contributions]] to the correlation energies for each <math>{\bf q}</math>-point, which can be found in the {{FILE|OUTCAR}} file of the ACFDT/RPA calculation performed with {{TAG|ALGO}} = RPA:
equation. This correlation energy can be compared with the [[ACFDT/RPA calculations|RPA contributions]]  
to the correlation energies for each <math>{\bf q}</math>-point, which can be
found in the {{FILE|OUTCAR}} file of the ACFDT/RPA
calculation performed with {{TAG|ALGO}} = RPA:


  q-point correlation energy      -0.232563      0.000000
  q-point correlation energy      -0.232563      0.000000
Line 266: Line 159:
  plasmon correlation energy        -0.5716670828
  plasmon correlation energy        -0.5716670828


For exact compatibility, {{TAG|ENCUT}} and {{TAG|ENCUTGW}} should be set to the same
For exact compatibility, {{TAG|ENCUT}} and {{TAG|ENCUTGW}} should be set to the same values in all calculations, while the head and wings of the dielectric matrix should not be included in the ACFDT/RPA calculations, i.e., remove the {{FILE|WAVEDER}} file prior to the ACFDT/RPA calculation. In the BSE/RPA calculation removing the {{FILE|WAVEDER}} file is not required. Furthermore, {{TAG|NBANDS}} in the ACFDT/RPA calculation must be identical to the number of included bands {{TAG|NBANDSO}} plus {{TAG|NBANDSV}} in the BSE/RPA, so that the same number of excitation pairs are included in both calculations. Also, the {{TAG|OMEGAMAX}} tag in the BSE calculation should not be set.
values in all calculations, while the head and wings of the dielectric matrix should not be included in the
ACFDT/RPA calculations, i.e. remove the {{FILE|WAVEDER}} file prior to the ACFDT/RPA
calculation. In the BSE/RPA calculation removing the {{FILE|WAVEDER}} file is not
required.
Furthermore, {{TAG|NBANDS}} in the ACFDT/RPA calculation must be identical to
the number of included bands {{TAG|NBANDSO}} plus {{TAG|NBANDSV}} in the BSE/RPA, so that the same number of excitation pairs are included
in both calculations. Also, the {{TAG|OMEGAMAX}} tag in the BSE calculation should not be set.


== Common issues ==
== Common issues ==
If the dielectric matrix contains only zeros in the {{FILE|vasprun.xml}} file,
If the dielectric matrix contains only zeros in the {{FILE|vasprun.xml}} file, the {{FILE|WAVEDER}} file was not read or is incompatible to the {{FILE|WAVEDER}} file. This requires a recalculation of the {{FILE|WAVEDER}} file. This can be achieved even after ''GW'' calculations using the following intermediate step:
the {{FILE|WAVEDER}} file was not read or is incompatible to the {{FILE|WAVEDER}}
file. This requires a recalculation of the {{FILE|WAVEDER}} file. This can be
achieved even after ''GW'' calculations using the following intermediate step:


  {{TAG|ALGO}}      = Nothing
  {{TAG|ALGO}}      = Nothing
Line 285: Line 168:
  {{TAG|LPEAD}}    = .TRUE.
  {{TAG|LPEAD}}    = .TRUE.


The flag {{TAG|LPEAD}} = .TRUE. is strictly required and enforces a
The flag {{TAG|LPEAD}} = .TRUE. is strictly required and enforces a "numerical" differentiation of the orbitals with respect to <math>k</math>. Calculating the derivatives of the orbitals with respect to <math>k</math> analytically is not possible at this point, since the Hamiltonian that was used to determine the orbitals is unknown to VASP.
"numerical" differentiation of the orbitals with respect to <math>k</math>.
Calculating the derivatives of the orbitals with respect to <math>k</math>
analytically is not possible at this point, since the Hamiltonian that was used
to determine the orbitals is unknown to VASP.


== Related tags and articles ==
== Related tags and articles ==
{{TAG|ALGO}},
{{TAG|ALGO}},
{{TAG|LOPTICS}},
{{TAG|LOPTICS}},
{{TAG|LPEAD}},
{{TAG|LHFCALC}},
{{TAG|LHFCALC}},
{{TAG|LRPA}},
{{TAG|LRPA}},
Line 302: Line 182:
{{TAG|OMEGAMAX}},
{{TAG|OMEGAMAX}},
{{TAG|LFXC}},
{{TAG|LFXC}},
{{TAG|ANTIRES}}
{{TAG|ANTIRES}},
{{TAG|NBSEEIG}},
{{FILE|BSEFATBAND}}


== References ==
== References ==

Latest revision as of 17:34, 7 February 2024

VASP offers a powerful module for solving the Bethe-Salpeter (BSE) equation[1][2]. The BSE can be used for obtaining the frequency-dependent dielectric function with the excitonic effects and can be based on the ground-state electronic structure in the DFT, hybrid-functional or GW approximations.

Solving Bethe-Salpeter equation

To take into account the excitonic effects or the electron-hole interaction, one has to use approximations beyond the independent-particle (IP) and the random-phase approximations (RPA). In VASP, it is done via the algorithm selected by ALGO = BSE. These essentially solves the same equations (Casida/Bethe-Salpeter) but differ in the way the screening of the Coulomb potential is treated. The TDHF approach uses the exact-correlation kernel , whereas BSE requires the from a preceding GW calculation. Thus, in order to perform TDHF or BSE calculations, one has to provide the ground-state orbitals (WAVECAR) and the derivatives of the orbitals with respect to (WAVEDER). In addition, the BSE calculation requires files storing the screened Coulomb kernel produced in a GW calculation, i.e., Wxxxx.tmp.

In summary, both TDHF and BSE approaches require a preceding ground-state calculation, however, the TDHF does not need the preceding GW and can be performed with the DFT or hybrid-functional orbitals and energies.

Bethe-Salpeter equation calculation

The BSE calculations require a preceding GW step to determine the screened Coulomb kernel . The details on GW calculations can be found in the practical guide to GW calculations. Here, we note that during the GW calculation, VASP writes this kernel into the following files 

W0001.tmp, W0002.tmp, ..., W{NKPTS}.tmp

and 

WFULL0001.tmp, WFULL0002.tmp, ..., WFULL{NKPTS}.tmp.

The files Wxxxx.tmp store only the diagonal terms of the kernel and are fairly small, whereas the files WFULLxxxx.tmp store the full matrix. It is important to make sure in the GW step that the flag LWAVE = .TRUE. is set, so that the WAVECAR stores the one-electron GW energies and the one-electron orbitals, if the GW calculation is self-consistent.

For the self-consistent GW calculations the following flags should be added 

LOPTICS   = .TRUE. 
LPEAD     = .TRUE.

in order to update the WAVEDER using finite differences (LPEAD = .TRUE.). The type of GW calculation is selected with the ALGO tag, which is discussed in great detail in the practical guide to GW calculations.

Once the GW step is completed, the BSE calculation can be performed using the following setup 

SYSTEM    = Si
NBANDS    = same as in GW calculation
ISMEAR    = 0
SIGMA     = 0.05
ALGO      = BSE
NBANDSO   = 4       ! determines how many occupied bands are used
NBANDSV   = 8       ! determines how many unoccupied (virtual) bands are used
OMEGAMAX  = desired_maximum_excitation_energy

Considering that quasiparticle energies in GW converge very slowly with the number of unoccupied bands and require large NBANDS, the number of bands included in the BSE calculation should be restricted explicitly by setting the occupied and unoccupied bands (NBANDSO and NBANDSV) included in the BSE Hamiltonian.

VASP tries to use sensible defaults, but it is highly recommended to check the OUTCAR file and make sure that the right bands are included. The tag OMEGAMAX specifies the maximum excitation energy of included electron-hole pairs and the pairs with the one-electron energy difference beyond this limit are not included in the BSE Hamiltonian. Hint: The convergence with respect to NBANDSV and OMEGAMAX should be thoroughly checked as the real part of the dielectric function, as well as the correlation energy, is usually very sensitive to these values, whereas the imaginary part of the dielectric function converges quickly.

At the beginning of the BSE calculation, VASP will try to read the WFULLxxxx.tmp files and if these files are not found, VASP will read the Wxxxx.tmp files. For small isotropic bulk systems, the diagonal approximation of the dielectric screening may be sufficient and yields results very similar to the calculation with the full dielectric tensor WFULLxxxx.tmp. Nevertheless, for molecules and atoms as well as surfaces, the full-screened Coulomb kernel is strictly required.

Both TDHF and BSE approaches write the calculated frequency-dependent dielectric function as well as the excitonic energies in the vasprun.xml file.

Model BSE (mBSE)

BSE calculations can be performed using a model dielectric function[3][4]. In this approach the calculation of the screened Coulomb potential is not required. Instead, the model dielectric function can be used to describe the screening of the Coulomb potential by setting the tag LMODELHF with parameters AEXX and HFSCREEN.

Model BSE calculation can be performed the following steps:

  1. ground-state calculation
  2. GW calculation (optional in model BSE calculation)
  3. optical absorption calculation via model BSE

For example, an optical absorption calculation of bulk Si can be performed using a model dielectric function as described in Ref. [4]. 

SYSTEM    = Si
ISMEAR    = 0 
SIGMA     = 0.05
NBANDS    = 16      ! or any larger desired value
ALGO      = D       ! Damped algorithm often required for HF type calculations, ALGO = Normal might work as well
LHFCALC   = .TRUE. 
LMODELHF  = .TRUE. 
AEXX      = 0.083
HFSCREEN  = 1.22
LOPTICS   = .TRUE.  ! can also be done in an additional intermediate step

In the second step, the dielectric function is evaluated by solving the Casida equation 

SYSTEM    = Si
ISMEAR    = 0 
SIGMA     = 0.05
NBANDS    = 16     
ALGO      = TDHF
IBSE      = 0
NBANDSO   = 4       ! number of occupied bands
NBANDSV   = 8       ! number of unoccupied bands
LHARTREE  = .TRUE.
LADDER    = .TRUE.
LFXC      = .FALSE. ! local xc kernel is disabled in mBSE 
LMODELHF  = .TRUE. 
AEXX      = 0.083
HFSCREEN  = 1.22

Calculations beyond Tamm-Dancoff approximation

The TDHF and BSE calculations beyond the Tamm-Dancoff approximation (TDA)[5] can be performed by setting the ANTIRES = 2 in the INCAR file 

SYSTEM       = Si
NBANDS       = same as in GW calculation
ISMEAR       = 0
SIGMA        = 0.05
ALGO         = BSE  
ANTIRES      = 2      ! beyond Tamm-Dancoff
LORBITALREAL = .TRUE. 
NBANDSO      = 4 
NBANDSV      = 8

The flag LORBITALREAL = .TRUE. forces VASP to make the orbitals real valued at the Gamma point as well as k-points at the edges of the Brillouin zone. This can improve the performance of BSE/TDHF calculations but it should be used consistently with the ground-state calculation.

Calculations at finite wavevectors

VASP can also calculate the dielectric function at a -vector compatible with the k-point grid (finite-momentum excitons). 

SYSTEM       = Si
NBANDS       = same as in GW calculation
ISMEAR       = 0 
SIGMA        = 0.05
ALGO         = BSE  
ANTIRES      = 2 
KPOINT_BSE   = 3 -1 0 0  ! q-point index,  three integers
LORBITALREAL = .TRUE.
NBANDSO      = 4 
NBANDSV      = 8

The tag KPOINT_BSE sets the -point and the shift at which the dielectric function is calculated. The first integer specifies the index of the -point and the other three values shift the provided -point by an arbitrary reciprocal vector . The reciprocal lattice vector is supplied by three integer values with . This feature is only supported as of VASP.6 (in VASP.5 the feature can be enabled, but the results are erroneous).

Consistency tests

In order to verify the results obtained in the BSE calculation, one can perform a number of consistency tests.

First test: IP dielectric function

The BSE code can be used to reproduce the independent particle spectrum if the RPA and the ladder diagrams are switched off 

LADDER   = .FALSE. 
LHARTREE = .FALSE.

This should yield exactly the same dielectric function as the preceding calculation with LOPTICS = .TRUE. We recommend to set the complex shift manually in the BSE as well as the preceding optics calculations, e.g. CSHIFT = 0.4. The dielectric functions produced in these calculations should be identical.

Second test: RPA dielectric function

The RPA/GW dielectric function can be used to verify the correctness of the RPA dielectric function calculated via the BSE algorithm. The RPA dielectric function in the BSE code can be calculated by switching off the ladder diagrams while keeping the RPA terms, i.e., the BSE calculation should be performed with the following tags 

ANTIRES   = 2
LHARTREE  = .TRUE.
LADDER    = .FALSE.
CSHIFT    = 0.4

The same dielectric function should be obtained via the GW code by setting these flags 

ALGO      = CHI 
NOMEGA    = 200
CSHIFT    = 0.4

Make sure that a large CSHIFT is selected as the GW code calculates the polarizability at very few frequency points. Note that the GW code does not use the TDA, so ANTIRES = 2 is required for the TDHF/BSE calculation. In our experience, the agreement can be made practically perfect provided sufficient frequency points are used and all available occupied and virtual orbitals are included in the BSE step.

Third test: RPA correlation energy

The BSE code can be used to calculate the correlation energy via the plasmon equation. This correlation energy can be compared with the RPA contributions to the correlation energies for each -point, which can be found in the OUTCAR file of the ACFDT/RPA calculation performed with ALGO = RPA: 

q-point correlation energy      -0.232563      0.000000
q-point correlation energy      -0.571667      0.000000
q-point correlation energy      -0.176976      0.000000

For instance, if the BSE calculation is performed at the second -point 

ANTIRES    = 2
LADDER     = .FALSE.
LHARTREE   = .TRUE.
KPOINT_BSE = 2 0 0 0

the same correlation energy should be found in the corresponding OUTCAR file: 

plasmon correlation energy        -0.5716670828

For exact compatibility, ENCUT and ENCUTGW should be set to the same values in all calculations, while the head and wings of the dielectric matrix should not be included in the ACFDT/RPA calculations, i.e., remove the WAVEDER file prior to the ACFDT/RPA calculation. In the BSE/RPA calculation removing the WAVEDER file is not required. Furthermore, NBANDS in the ACFDT/RPA calculation must be identical to the number of included bands NBANDSO plus NBANDSV in the BSE/RPA, so that the same number of excitation pairs are included in both calculations. Also, the OMEGAMAX tag in the BSE calculation should not be set.

Common issues

If the dielectric matrix contains only zeros in the vasprun.xml file, the WAVEDER file was not read or is incompatible to the WAVEDER file. This requires a recalculation of the WAVEDER file. This can be achieved even after GW calculations using the following intermediate step: 

ALGO      = Nothing
LOPTICS   = .TRUE.
LPEAD     = .TRUE.

The flag LPEAD = .TRUE. is strictly required and enforces a "numerical" differentiation of the orbitals with respect to . Calculating the derivatives of the orbitals with respect to analytically is not possible at this point, since the Hamiltonian that was used to determine the orbitals is unknown to VASP.

Related tags and articles

ALGO, LOPTICS, LPEAD, LHFCALC, LRPA, LADDER, LHARTREE, NBANDSV, NBANDSO, OMEGAMAX, LFXC, ANTIRES, NBSEEIG, BSEFATBAND

References

  1. ↑ S. Albrecht, L. Reining, R. Del Sole, and G. Onida, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4510-4513 (1998).
  2. ↑ M. Rohlfing and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2312-2315 (1998).
  3. ↑ M. Bokdam, T. Sander, A. Stroppa, S. Picozzi, D. D. Sarma, C. Franchini, and G. Kresse, Sci. Rep. 6, 28618 (2016).
  4. ↑ a b A. Tal, P. Liu, G. Kresse, A. Pasquarello, Accurate optical spectra through time-dependent density functional theory based on screening-dependent hybrid functionals, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 032019 (2020)
  5. ↑ T. Sander, E. Maggio, and G. Kresse, Beyond the Tamm-Dancoff approximation for extended systems using exact diagonalization, Phys. Rev. B 92, 045209 (2015).
Retrieved from "https://www.vasp.at/wiki/index.php?title=Bethe-Salpeter-equations_calculations&oldid=23743"