Matsubara formalism: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The zero-temperature formalism of many-body perturbation theory breaks down for metals (systems with zero energy band-gap) as pointed out by Kohn and Luttinger.{{cite|KohnLuttinger:PR:1960}} This conundrum is lifted by considering diagrammatic perturbation theory at finite temperature <math>T>0</math>, which | The zero-temperature formalism of many-body perturbation theory breaks down for metals (systems with zero energy band-gap) as pointed out by Kohn and Luttinger.{{cite|KohnLuttinger:PR:1960}} This conundrum is lifted by considering diagrammatic perturbation theory at finite temperature <math>T>0</math>, which may be understood by an analytical continuation of the real-time <math>t</math> to the imaginary time axis <math>-i\tau</math>. Matsubara has shown that this Wick rotation in time <math>t\to-i\tau</math> reveals an intriguing connection to the inverse temperature <math>\beta=1/T</math> of the system.{{cite|Matsubara:PTP:1955}} | ||
More precisely, Matsubara has shown that all terms in perturbation theory at finite temperature can be expressed as integrals of imaginary time quantities (such as the polarizability <math>\chi(-i\tau)</math>) over the fundamental interval <math>-\beta\le\tau\le\beta</math>. | More precisely, Matsubara has shown that all terms in perturbation theory at finite temperature can be expressed as integrals of imaginary time quantities (such as the polarizability <math>\chi(-i\tau)</math>) over the fundamental interval <math>-\beta\le\tau\le\beta</math>. | ||
As a consequence, one decomposes imaginary time quantities into a Fourier series with period <math>\beta</math> | As a consequence, one decomposes imaginary time quantities into a Fourier series with period <math>\beta</math> | ||
that determines the spacing of the | that determines the spacing of the Fourier modes. For instance the imaginary polarizability can be written as | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
and the corresponding random phase approximation of the correlation energy at finite temperature becomes a series over (in this case bosonic) Matsubara frequencies | and the corresponding random-phase approximation of the correlation energy at finite temperature becomes a series over (in this case, bosonic) Matsubara frequencies | ||
<math> | <math> | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
</math> | </math> | ||
The Matsubara formalism has the advantage that all contributions to the Green's function and the polarizability are mathematically well-defined, including contributions from states close to the chemical potential <math>\epsilon_{n{\bf k}}\approx \mu</math>, such that Matsubara series converge | The Matsubara formalism has the advantage that all contributions to the Green's function and the polarizability are mathematically well-defined, including contributions from states close to the chemical potential <math>\epsilon_{n{\bf k}}\approx \mu</math>, such that Matsubara series also converge for metallic systems. | ||
Although formally convenient, Matsubara series | Although formally convenient, the Matsubara series converges poorly with the number of considered terms in practice. VASP, therefore, uses a compressed representation of the Fourier modes by employing the Minimax-Isometry method.{{cite|Kaltak:PRB:2020}} This approach converges exponentially with the number of considered frequency points. | ||
[[Category:Theory | [[Category:Theory]][[Category:Low-scaling GW and RPA]][[Category:Many-body perturbation theory]] |
Latest revision as of 06:32, 21 February 2024
The zero-temperature formalism of many-body perturbation theory breaks down for metals (systems with zero energy band-gap) as pointed out by Kohn and Luttinger.[1] This conundrum is lifted by considering diagrammatic perturbation theory at finite temperature , which may be understood by an analytical continuation of the real-time to the imaginary time axis . Matsubara has shown that this Wick rotation in time reveals an intriguing connection to the inverse temperature of the system.[2] More precisely, Matsubara has shown that all terms in perturbation theory at finite temperature can be expressed as integrals of imaginary time quantities (such as the polarizability ) over the fundamental interval .
As a consequence, one decomposes imaginary time quantities into a Fourier series with period that determines the spacing of the Fourier modes. For instance the imaginary polarizability can be written as
and the corresponding random-phase approximation of the correlation energy at finite temperature becomes a series over (in this case, bosonic) Matsubara frequencies
The Matsubara formalism has the advantage that all contributions to the Green's function and the polarizability are mathematically well-defined, including contributions from states close to the chemical potential , such that Matsubara series also converge for metallic systems.
Although formally convenient, the Matsubara series converges poorly with the number of considered terms in practice. VASP, therefore, uses a compressed representation of the Fourier modes by employing the Minimax-Isometry method.[3] This approach converges exponentially with the number of considered frequency points.