EDIFF: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{TAGDEF|EDIFF|[real]|<math>10^{-4}</math>}} | {{TAGDEF|EDIFF|[real]|<math>10^{-4}</math>}} | ||
Description: {{TAG|EDIFF}} specifies the global break condition for the electronic SC-loop. | Description: {{TAG|EDIFF}} specifies the global break condition for the electronic SC-loop. {{TAG|EDIFF}} is specified in units of eV. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
The relaxation of the electronic degrees of freedom | The relaxation of the electronic degrees of freedom stops if the total (free) energy change and the band-structure-energy change ('change of eigenvalues') between two steps are both smaller than {{TAG|EDIFF}} (in eV). For {{TAG|EDIFF}}=0, strictly {{TAG|NELM}} electronic self-consistency steps will be performed. | ||
In most cases, the convergence speed is quadratic, so often the cost for the additional iterations is small. Hence, for well converged calculations, we strongly recommend to decrease {{TAG|EDIFF}} to 1E-6. For finite difference calculations (e.g. phonons), even {{TAG|EDIFF}} {{=}} 1E-7 might be required in order to obtain precise results. On the other hand, for large systems with many atoms and/or when using meta-GGA functionals, attaining an energy convergence of 1E-8 or even 1E-7 might be difficult. So, overall {{TAG|EDIFF}}= 1E-6 is likely the best compromise. | |||
== Related | == Related tags and articles == | ||
{{TAG|EDIFFG}} | {{TAG|EDIFFG}} | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
[[Category:INCAR]][[Category:Electronic | [[Category:INCAR tag]][[Category:Electronic minimization]] | ||
Latest revision as of 20:24, 15 November 2023
EDIFF = [real]
Default: EDIFF =
Description: EDIFF specifies the global break condition for the electronic SC-loop. EDIFF is specified in units of eV.
The relaxation of the electronic degrees of freedom stops if the total (free) energy change and the band-structure-energy change ('change of eigenvalues') between two steps are both smaller than EDIFF (in eV). For EDIFF=0, strictly NELM electronic self-consistency steps will be performed.
In most cases, the convergence speed is quadratic, so often the cost for the additional iterations is small. Hence, for well converged calculations, we strongly recommend to decrease EDIFF to 1E-6. For finite difference calculations (e.g. phonons), even EDIFF = 1E-7 might be required in order to obtain precise results. On the other hand, for large systems with many atoms and/or when using meta-GGA functionals, attaining an energy convergence of 1E-8 or even 1E-7 might be difficult. So, overall EDIFF= 1E-6 is likely the best compromise.