Question about electric dipole in heterostructure
I have a question/sanity check about treatment of electrostatics in VASP. I think my confusion may just stem from not thinking properly about the physics, but nevertheless I want to ask about this.
I am performing calculations of a heterostructure consisting of an antiferromagnetic insulator (Cr2O3) and a heavy metal (Pt), terminated with vacuum on both sides. Due to the difference in electrostatic potential between the heavy metal and the insulator , I would expect an electric dipole to be formed at the heavy metal-insulating interface, and also separately, an electric dipole formed across the entire slab due to the difference in the delta E between vacuum and the insulating interface, and the delta E between vacuum and the heavy metal interface. I attach the INCAR and structure file here.
If we look at the LOCPOT plotted along the c-axis of the heterostructure (generated with LVHAR=.TRUE.), we do see a finite slope in the vacuum region, consistent with the second dipole source I described. Also, there is a clear "crossover region" between the insulator and heavy metal at their interface, before the potential on either side look like that of the isolated consitutents.
What I'm confused by is why the average electrostatic potential across the insulator (between about .5 and .7 of the fractional c-coordinate) appears completely flat, and does not have a slope. I guess maybe I can understand for the heavy-metal region (0.7-1) as the electric dipole might be screened here, but for the insulating compound I don't see how the dipole would be screened. Clearly, the slab has a finite electric dipole through the structure as manifested in the vacuum area. But I don't understand why this doesn't also seem to show up in the electrostatic potential profile within the slab region. As an aside, this calculation was done without dipole corrections but the same thing happens if I include them (i.e. slope in vacuum, no slope across structure ).
Does this simply have to do with the details of electrostatic boundary conditions in VASP? Or is this profile consistent with what you would expect based on physics (in which case if you could clarify that would be great.)
Thanks in advance!